ETF Head-to-Head

DGRO vs SCHD: Dividend Growth ETF Showdown

Two of the best dividend growth ETFs take different paths to the same goal. iShares goes broad, Schwab goes concentrated. Here is which approach wins.

14 min read-Updated February 2026

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Expense Ratio0.08%
Dividend Yield2.32%
Holdings420+
10-Year Return11.3%
AUM$28B+
InceptionJune 2014
Div Growth (5Y)10.2%

SCHD

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

Expense Ratio0.06%
Dividend Yield3.45%
Holdings103
10-Year Return11.1%
AUM$63B+
InceptionOctober 2011
Div Growth (5Y)12.1%

The Quick Verdict

Choose DGRO If:

  • You want maximum diversification (420+ stocks)
  • You prefer more tech exposure for growth
  • You are building long-term wealth (not taking income)
  • You hold in a taxable account (lower yield = fewer taxes)

Choose SCHD If:

  • You want higher current income (3.45% vs 2.32%)
  • You value quality screening over broad exposure
  • You want faster dividend growth (12% vs 10%)
  • You are approaching or in retirement

How Each Fund Selects Stocks

DGRO Methodology

  • 5+ years of consecutive dividend growth
  • Payout ratio below 75% (sustainability check)
  • Market-cap weighted with sector caps
  • Includes growth companies that have started paying dividends recently
  • Broad universe: any market cap qualifies

SCHD Methodology

  • 10+ years of consecutive dividend payments
  • Cash flow to debt ratio (financial strength)
  • Return on equity (profitability)
  • Dividend yield (income potential)
  • 5-year dividend growth rate

The key philosophical difference: DGRO casts a wide net and applies basic sustainability screens, while SCHD is highly selective with multi-factor quality ranking. DGRO's approach captures more companies (including newer dividend payers like Apple and Microsoft), while SCHD focuses on proven, financially strong dividend champions.

Performance Comparison

MetricDGROSCHDWinner
1-Year Total Return10.8%8.2%DGRO
3-Year Total Return8.5%7.8%DGRO
5-Year Total Return10.8%11.5%SCHD
Since Overlap (2014-2026)11.3%11.1%DGRO
Current Dividend Yield2.32%3.45%SCHD
5-Year Dividend Growth10.2%12.1%SCHD
Expense Ratio0.08%0.06%SCHD
Max Drawdown (5yr)-22.8%-19.8%SCHD
Number of Holdings420+103DGRO

The total return battle is remarkably close, with DGRO slightly ahead in recent years due to its higher tech allocation benefiting from the AI rally. However, SCHD wins decisively on current yield and dividend growth rate, making it the better choice for income investors.

Sector Allocation Differences

SectorDGROSCHDNotable Difference
Technology18.4%11.7%DGRO has much more tech
Financials17.2%18.2%Similar
Healthcare16.8%15.8%Similar
Industrials11.2%12.1%Similar
Consumer Staples9.4%13.4%SCHD more defensive
Energy8.1%10.5%SCHD overweight
Consumer Disc.6.8%7.8%Similar
Utilities5.3%0%DGRO includes utilities

DGRO's 18.4% technology allocation (including Apple, Microsoft, and Broadcom) gives it a meaningful growth tilt compared to SCHD's 11.7%. DGRO also includes utilities, which SCHD excludes entirely. Meanwhile, SCHD has heavier consumer staples and energy exposure for more defensive positioning.

Start Building Dividend Income Today

Get our free Dividend Investing Starter Kit + weekly tips delivered to your inbox

Join 2,500+ dividend investors. Unsubscribe anytime.

Holdings Overlap

420+

DGRO Holdings

~65%

Overlap (SCHD in DGRO)

103

SCHD Holdings

Approximately 65% of SCHD's holdings also appear in DGRO, since DGRO's broad 420-stock universe captures most of SCHD's quality names. However, the weights differ significantly: SCHD concentrates more in its top holdings while DGRO spreads the weight more evenly. This makes holding both somewhat redundant -- choose one based on your priorities.

Income Growth Projection: $100,000 Investment

YearDGRO IncomeSCHD IncomeGap
Year 1$2,320$3,450$1,130
Year 5$3,760$6,110$2,350
Year 10$6,090$10,830$4,740
Year 15$9,860$19,200$9,340
Year 20$15,960$34,050$18,090

Assumes 10.2% dividend growth (DGRO) and 12.1% (SCHD), dividends reinvested. Projections are illustrative.

Key Insight: Despite only a 2% difference in annual dividend growth rate (10.2% vs 12.1%), SCHD generates more than double DGRO's income by year 20. This is because SCHD starts with 49% higher yield AND grows faster. The compounding difference is enormous.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DGRO or SCHD better for beginners?

Both are excellent for beginners. DGRO is slightly simpler conceptually (buy companies growing their dividends, broadly diversified) while SCHD requires understanding its quality-factor approach. If you want "set it and forget it" diversification, DGRO edges ahead. If you want higher income, SCHD wins.

Can I hold both DGRO and SCHD?

You can, but there is significant overlap (~65%). You are essentially double-weighting the stocks that appear in both funds. Unless you specifically want to tilt toward both broad diversification and quality concentration, picking one is simpler and more efficient.

Which ETF is better in a bear market?

SCHD has historically held up better during market downturns. Its quality screening and value tilt provide a natural defensive buffer. In 2022, SCHD fell about 3% less than DGRO. SCHD's lower beta (0.82 vs 0.88) confirms its more defensive character.

Does DGRO hold Apple and Microsoft?

Yes, DGRO holds both Apple (~3.5% weight) and Microsoft (~3.2% weight) as top holdings since both have established consistent dividend growth histories. SCHD does not hold either because they do not meet its higher yield threshold. This is a key differentiator.

Which has lower taxes in a taxable account?

DGRO generates less taxable income due to its lower 2.32% yield (vs SCHD's 3.45%). Both pay primarily qualified dividends taxed at preferential rates. For taxable accounts where you want to minimize annual tax drag, DGRO has a slight advantage.

Model Your Dividend Growth Journey

Compare how DGRO and SCHD dividends compound over time using our free calculators. See the long-term impact of different growth rates on your income.

Related Articles